~ Military News ~

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Subsistence Allowance, Most Housing Allowances to Rise in 2012

by Karen Parrish, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - Service members stationed in the United States will see an average increase of 2 percent when new basic allowance for housing rates take effect Jan. 1.

   The Defense Department announced the 2012 BAH rates today, along with basic allowance for subsistence rates, which will also increase slightly.

   Department officials said the average BAH increase for 2012 is approximately $39 per month, though the actual amount depends on where a service member lives, what his or her rank is and whether he or she is supporting family members.

   Cheryl Anne Woehr, defense BAH program manager, said about 35 percent of the military's housing areas will see a housing allowance decrease, but the change will apply only to members newly reporting to those locations.

   Service members are given individual rate protection, she said, which ensures that those already assigned to a location will not see their BAH rate decrease. However, they will receive the increase if the rate goes up.

   That protection ensures the rate change doesn't penalize service members who already are obligated to leases or rental contracts based on a previous, higher housing cost, Woehr said.

   "We measure the cost of rental housing in each area, and economic factors can have different influences in each area," she said. "That's why rates are going up in some areas and down in others."

   DOD collects housing data annually for each military housing area, recording current local costs for rent, renter's insurance and utilities including electricity, heating, water and sewer, she explained.

   Any year-to-year change in any of those factors can cause an increase or decrease in BAH, Woehr noted.

   "The highest [BAH] rates are in the areas you'd expect, the high-cost urban areas such as San Francisco, Boston [and] New York," she said. "The lowest areas are in the more rural parts of the country."

   Woehr said service members stationed outside the United States receive the Overseas Housing Allowance, which is calculated on a different schedule, rather than BAH.

   Defense officials said BAH rates are determined based on six housing profiles -- varying by dwelling type and number of bedrooms -- in each military housing area. Rates are calculated for each pay grade, both with and without dependents.

   Officials said more than 1 million service members will receive an estimated $20 billion in total BAH payments during 2012.

   Officials said the 2012 subsistence allowance, which will also take effect Jan. 1, is designed to cover the cost of food for service members who do not have access to military dining facilities. That allowance will increase from $325.04 to $348.44 for enlisted troops, and from $223.84 to $239.96 for officers.

   The allowance is based on the Department of Agriculture's "cost of food at home index," which increased 7.2 percent between October 2011 and October 2011, officials said.

 

__________________________________________________________________

 

 

Panetta Concludes Iraq Mission Noting Service, Sacrifice

by Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service

 

   BAGHDAD - Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta joined Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey and other U.S. and Iraq leaders in honoring eight years of service and sacrifice as they commemorated the end of the U.S. military mission in Iraq.

   "No words, no ceremony can provide full tribute to the sacrifices that have brought this day to pass," the secretary said during a ceremony here.

   Panetta paid tribute to the Iraqi government and military for their courage, leadership and loyalty to Iraq's future. "Your dream of an independent and sovereign Iraq is now a reality," he said.

   He also praised the leadership of Ambassador James Jeffrey and Army Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of U.S. Forces Iraq, who oversaw the drawdown that the secretary called "one of the most complex logistical undertakings in U.S. military history."

   "Your effort to make this day a reality is nothing short of miraculous," he said.

   But Panetta reserved his highest praise for more than 1 million U.S. military members who served in Iraq since 2003. "Your nation is deeply indebted to you," he said. "You have done everything your nation asked you to do and more. Your dedication, your commitment to this mission has been the driving force behind the remarkable progress we have seen here in Baghdad and across the country."

   The secretary recognized the nearly 4,500 service members who died and more than 30,000 who were wounded making this progress a reality.

   He also acknowledged family members who have experienced the strain, sacrifice and heartbreak of watching their loved ones deploy into harm's way time and time again.

   The outcome being commemorated today was never certain, the secretary said. He recalled traveling to Iraq in 2006, one of the most challenging periods of the conflict, as part of President George H.W. Bush's Iraq Study Group. Sectarian violence had spiraled out of control and Iraq was in turmoil.

   Five years later, at great cost in both blood and treasure, "the mission of an Iraq that could govern and secure itself has become real," the secretary said.

   "The Iraqi army and police have been rebuilt. Violence levels are down, al-Qaida weakened, rule of law strengthened, educational opportunities expanded and economic growth expanding," he said. "And this progress has been sustained even as we have withdrawn nearly 150,000 U.S. combat forces from the country."

   The cost has been high, in blood and treasure for the United States and for the Iraqi people, Panetta noted. "But because of the sacrifices made, these years of war have now yielded to a new era of opportunity," for a free, independent and sovereign Iraq, he said.

   Panetta emphasized that Iraq's challenges aren't over, but promised that the United States will continue to stand with Iraq as it navigates them. "Together with the Iraqi people, the United States welcomes the next stage in U.S.-Iraqi relations, one that will be rooted in mutual interest and mutual respect," he said.

   In addition to a significant diplomatic presence, the United States will continue to promote partnership between U.S. and Iraqi military forces, Panetta said. "We will continue to help Iraq address violent extremism and defend against external threats," he said, helping protect "all that has been sacrificed and accomplished."

   "We will continue to have a robust and enduring military presence across the Middle East," he said.

   For Iraq, Panetta called today an opportunity for it to forge ahead on a path to security and prosperity.

   "We undertake this transition today reminding Iraq that it has in the United States a committed friend and a committed partner," he said. "We owe it to all the lives that have been sacrificed in this war not to fail.

   "This is not the end," he concluded. "This is truly the beginning."

   After the casing of the colors, Panetta met with about 100 service members deployed during the final days of Operation New Dawn to thank them for their service.

   "It is because of you," and those who served here during the past eight years, "that we are able to be here today to mark the end of this war," he said.

   Asked by a young service member if the United States will be able to assist the Iraqis in the future if they need it, Panetta expressed confidence that it will, in accordance with an agreement to be reached by the Americans and Iraqis.

   "We may be ending the war, but we are not walking away from our responsibilities," he said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

General Explains Changes to Mortuary Disposal Process

by Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - As soon as officials at the Air Force Port Mortuary in Dover, Del., realized cremated and incinerated service member remains were being disposed of in a landfill, they changed the process, Lt. Gen. Darrell D. Jones said today.

   Jones, the Air Force's deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel and services, discussed with Pentagon reporters the disposition of subsequently indentified remains.

   Jones said Air Force leaders are sorry if the process has caused families any further anguish.

   The prevalence of improvised explosive devices in today's combat -- everything from buried hand grenades to large bombs filled with hundreds of pounds of explosives � has complicated mortuary processes, Jones explained.

   "The remains of many of our fallen are fragmented," he said. "We strive to return these fallen to their families as intact as possible."

   This is often difficult and sometimes the armed forces medical examiner determines the remains are incomplete. A family member then signs a statement electing how to dispose of any subsequently identified remains, Jones said. "The family determines how the service will proceed if additional portions of remains are identified," he said.

   In some cases, the family does not want to be notified if additional portions of remains are identified, Jone said, adding that the additional remains most often are small portions of soft tissue or bone fragments.

   Prior to 2008, when families chose not to be notified of these remains, the mortuary disposed of them using "appropriate industry standards," Jones said. The remains were taken to a local funeral home for cremation. The cremated remains were then given to a contractor for incineration and subsequent disposal in a landfill. Remains of 274 service members were disposed of this way between 2003 and 2008, the general said.

   "In 2008, the director of the Port Mortuary reviewed these processes and recommended to the Central Joint Mortuary Affairs Board that the services implement a retirement--at-sea option that was more fitting for subsequently identified remains," Jones said.

   The retirement at sea is a dignified ceremony, and that has been the standard since 2008. The remains are cremated and placed in a sea-salt urn. The mortuary arranges with the Navy to have the retirement at sea.

   Jones said the mortuary mission is to treat all remains with dignity, honor and respect. Mortuary employees also stand ready to help the families of the fallen. In 2008, mortuary employees were the ones who pushed for the change once they realized how the remains were being disposed of.

   "It was employees at the Dover Port Mortuary who, on their own volition, came up with that suggestion, that recommendation, to make that policy change back in 2008," Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt. John Kirby told reporters today. "That wasn't something imposed upon them. It wasn't the result of some [inspector general] report. They came up with this on their own."

   The Air Force has set up a hotline for families who have questions about the processes the mortuary used. It is 1-855-637-2583. Or families with questions can e-mail officials at dover.pm@pentagon.af.mil.

   "We will be forthright, we will tell them everything we know about the disposition of their loved one," Jones said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Japanese-American Vets Receive Bronze Star Medals

by C. Todd Lopez, Army News Service

 

   WASHINGTON - In a ceremony here on Nov. 2, 2011 more than 66 years after hostilities ended in World War II, 40 Americans received the Bronze Stars they deserved for combat service in that conflict.

 

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno pins a Bronze Star on Medal of Honor recipient George Joe Sakato at a Nov. 1, 2011, ceremony in Washington, D.C., in which 40 World War II soldiers from all-Japanese-American units -- the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, the 100th Infantry Battalion and the Military Intelligence Service -- were awarded the Bronze Star. U.S. Army photo by C. Todd Lopez

 

   The Japanese-American soldiers fought as part of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, the 100th Infantry Battalion and the Military Intelligence Service.

   Army officials decided that all soldiers who wore the Combat Infantry Badge from World War II were owed a Bronze Star; some, however, never received theirs.

   Getting such an award, in many cases, depended on "how good your clerk was, ... and some of the clerks were not that great," said retired Army Lt. Gen. Joseph F. Peterson. It's really a matter of poor paperwork that the soldiers had to wait so long to get their Bronze Stars, he added.

   The general organized a three-day recognition of Japanese-American soldiers in Washington, D.C. The highlight has some 800 of those veterans being honored with the Congressional Gold Medal during a ceremony at the U.S. Capitol. But for the soldiers who gathered at a posh hotel, the day was about finally getting the Bronze Star they had earned.

   At the event, 31 of those soldiers were present to have the medal pinned on their chest by Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno. Another nine Bronze Stars were provided to the family members of soldiers who could not attend or who have died.

   "It's amazing to get a star like this," said Don K. Masuda, one of the recipients of the award. The former soldier attended the event with his wife, his daughter, and two of his grandsons. He said he's led "a pretty good life" since leaving the Army, which has included being a co-owner of a shipping business in his native Hawaii, and also working six years for the postal service.

   He served as an infantryman in World War II, in both Italy and France, as part of the 442nd RCT. He earned two Purple Hearts during his service. He said he's been waiting "a pretty long time" to have a Bronze Star.

   Fellow 442nd RCT soldier George Joe Sakato was also at the award ceremony -- both as a recipient of the Bronze Star and as a speaker. Sakato is one of 21 Japanese-American Medal of Honor recipients to come out of the 442nd RCT and 100th Infantry Battalion.

   On behalf of the 33,000 Japanese-Americans soldiers who served in World War II, Sakato thanked Congress for the Congressional Gold Medal they are received. He also thanked his country for the opportunity to earn that honor.

   "We also thank the government, which allowed us to serve in the U.S. Army to defend our country and to prove our loyalty to America," Sakato said.

   Odierno reiterated for those at the event the greatness of the Japanese-American soldiers' service and the service of all who served in World War II, calling them "the greatest generation."

   But the general also touched on the tragedy those soldiers faced that other soldiers did not. Many of their families back home were locked away in camps and branded as enemies of America, even while their sons served to defend the country's ideals.

   "From the shock of Pearl Harbor, and out of fear and prejudice, 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry were sent to internment camps," Odierno said. "But what's incredible to me is that many of them did not allow that grave injustice of the internment to stand in their way. They remained steadfast in their commitment to their country, and volunteered to serve a nation in combat -- a selfless act of devotion."

   Those Japanese-American soldiers, he said, served as infantrymen, linguists, military intelligence specialists and artillerymen.

   "Over 33,000 Japanese-Americans served in the war," Odierno said. "And of those, over 13,000 served in the 442nd, and earned over 9,000 Purple Hearts."

   The 442nd became the most highly decorated unit in the Army's history, Odierno said. The 442nd and the 100th Infantry Battalion together earned seven Presidential Unit Citations, two Meritorious Service Plaques, 36 Army Commendation Medals, and 87 Division Commendations. Individually, soldiers earned 21 Medals of Honor, 29 Distinguished Service Crosses, one Distinguished Service Medal, more than 354 Silver Stars, and more than 4,000 Purple Hearts.

   "Together, they define the ethos that we all live by today: 'Never leave a fallen comrade,'" Odierno said.

   The experience of World War II provided a lesson about tolerance, the general said.

   "The lesson of the Japanese-American experience is that fear and prejudice make our country weaker, not stronger," Odierno said. "Japanese-Americans, like others, have more than earned their place in our country, in our Army, and in our society -- a melting pot to include African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans and today, Arab-Americans."

   About 240 veterans attended the Bronze Star event. Another 100 spouses of deceased veterans also attended, as did about 500 family members representing soldiers.

   Peterson, who has Japanese ancestry, said the event was both to honor those soldiers who served, and to educate America.

   "It's educational for our nation to know that a group of soldiers and a group of Americans, who because of the mass hysteria when the imperial military of Japan attacked Pearl Harbor -- were classified enemy aliens," Peterson said.

   About 120,000 Japanese-Americans were rounded up, Peterson said, and put into any of 10 internment camps across nine states.

   "Out of those camps came a demand, by 65 percent of them -- 65 percent of 120,000 internees -- to serve their country in a time of war," he said.

   Those soldiers who served in units like the 442nd RCT, the 100th Infantry Battalion and the Military Intelligence Service, Peterson said, averaged number three individual awards for heroism.

   "They are the most decorated unit in U.S. military history of its size and duration of the conflict," he said.

 

Medal of Honor recipient George Joe Sakato speaks at a Nov. 1, 2011, ceremony in Washington, D.C., in which 40 World War II soldiers from all-Japanese-American units -- the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, the 100th Infantry Battalion and the Military Intelligence Service -- were awarded the Bronze Star. U.S. Army photo by C. Todd Lopez

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Dempsey Calls for Increasing US Partnership with Turkey

by Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - The United States and Turkey are allies with common interests on most issues and an increasing partnership, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said at the 30th Annual Conference on U.S.-Turkish Relations here yesterday.

 

Turkish Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz, left, talks with Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during the 30th Annual Conference on U.S. and Turkish Relations in Washington D.C., Nov. 1, 2011. DOD photo by D. Myles Cullen

 

   Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey called for the relationship between the two countries to continue expanding, acknowledging that they won't always agree.

   "As our partnership grows, ... we may have an occasional difference or two," Dempsey said. "That is OK. In fact, in some ways, this is healthy for two free and sovereign nations."

   The biggest disagreement between the two nations occurred in 2003, when Turkey did not allow U.S. troops to transit its territory at the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

   Turkey is at the crossroads that serves as a bridge between eastern and western and Europe and the Middle East. It has had a vibrant economy as the rest of the region has undergone recession. With new governments emerging in the Muslim world, Turkey -- a secular state with a majority Muslim population -- can serve as a positive role model to leaders in the Middle East, Dempsey said.

   The chairman echoed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who spoke to the conference Oct. 31.

   "I have to confess that some Americans, including quite a few on Capitol Hill, have questions about the future of this vital partnership," Clinton said. "And they wonder about its durability, and they wonder about the future role that Turkey will play in the region. I want to emphasize that the United States welcomes Turkey's growing role in the region and on the world stage.

   "Now, we do not always see eye to eye," she continued. "In fact, no two nations -- or two friends, or even two members of the same family -- ever do. But we are confident that as Turkey assumes the responsibilities that come with increased influence, our partnership will become even more productive in the years ahead."

   Turkey is a solid military ally that deployed a brigade to fight alongside U.S. troops in the Korean War, served as a steadfast ally during the Cold War and continues to play a constructive role with 1,800 service members in Afghanistan today, Dempsey said last night.

   "Turkey has also positively engaged Iraq, working with Iraqi leaders to reinforce that nation's emerging democracy and helping it rebuild," the chairman added.

   Terrorists have targeted both Turkey and the United States, Dempsey noted, and the two nations continue to work together to combat terrorism.

   "Rest assured," he said, "the United States stands with Turkey in this struggle, and we will continue to provide counterterrorism support and help crack down on terrorist activities around the world."

   Dempsey extended the sympathies and prayers of the 2.2 million men and women in the U.S. armed forces for the loss of life and devastation of the recent magnitude 7.2 earthquake in eastern Turkey.

   "We've been very proud to play even a small part in helping you recover from that," he said. "You know and can be sure that our country is committed to you as you recover and rebuild, and we're proud to call you our friends."

   Dempsey said he is confident that the United States and Turkey will continue to focus on the common ground the two countries share to forge an even deeper partnership in the future.

   "We must stay engaged and keep communicating," he said, "because as our already strong relationship grows in breadth and depth, we have to move beyond the world of labels. We need to move beyond the old paradigms of East and West, Christian or Muslim, New World or Old World, and on to building a bold and bright and new future together."

   The chairman added a personal note, telling the audience that the day marked his one-year anniversary of being cancer-free.

   "Last year I had cancer," he said. "You can't imagine how that changes your perspective on things. It allows you ... to see things and empathize with people more than, perhaps, I'm sorry to say, I did before."

   Turkish Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz attended the meeting after having met with Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta at the Pentagon earlier in the day.

   "The two leaders discussed a broad range of mutually significant security issues, to include defense-industrial cooperation, foreign military sales, the common threat of terrorism and regional challenges," Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt. John Kirby said in a written statement.

   Panetta reassured Yilmaz of America's commitment to a strong security relationship with Turkey, praised Turkey's contributions to the training mission in Afghanistan and pledged to continue assisting in earthquake relief efforts, should that support be required, Kirby added.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

__________________________________________________________

 

 

Officials Stress Keeping Faith on Military Retirement

by Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - The Defense Department has no proposals or recommendations on revamping military retirement at this time, but any future proposal must not break faith with those in the military today, senior Pentagon officials told Congress yesterday.

   Jo Ann Rooney, principal deputy undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, and Vee Penrod, deputy assistant secretary of defense for military personnel policy, testified on military retirement before the House Armed Services Committee's military personnel subcommittee.

   The Defense Business Board has proposed making a military retirement system more like private-sector systems. The military system has remained fairly constant over time, Rooney said, while the private sector has changed its retirement systems to cater to the increasingly mobile workforce.

   "Unlike [the private] sector, the military services must grow most of their military workforce internally," she said. "It generally takes 15 to 20 years to develop the next generation of infantry battalion commanders and submarine captains. As a result, the military must ensure compensation, promotions and personnel policies that all foster the retention and longer careers necessary to create these experienced leaders."

   The military, she said, needs greater longevity and continuity to develop leaders, and a retirement system mirroring a private-sector approach -- with contributions from individuals and transportable benefits -- may not be the best way for the uniformed services to go.

   This does not mean that the current system is sacrosanct, Rooney said. The department should examine the retirement system in the context of a total military compensation system, she added.

   DOD officials, she told the panel, are examining all aspects of the retirement system for all components. Rooney said the review has been deliberate, careful and pragmatic, and that officials are reviewing proposals and modeling them to determine the impact on recruiting and retention.

   The Defense Department, she said, is working to strike the correct balance. "This includes weighing the impact of a new system on recruiting and retention, considering the welfare of the individual service members and families -- which includes grandfathering our existing force who took their oath under the current system -- and acknowledging our responsibility to the American taxpayer," she said.

   The current military retirement system has supported the most-successful volunteer force in the world, Penrod noted.

   "The question now," Penrod added, "is whether the current system is still relevant in today's environment. If not, should it be modified in a manner more in line with the private sector?"

   Officials are not looking at retirement in isolation, Penrod pointed out, but rather at how personnel and pay policies affect decisions to join the military and then to stay.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Partnership is 'Win-Win' for Spouses, Employers

by Elaine Sanchez, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - The Military Spouse Employment Partnership is successfully connecting highly qualified, job-seeking military spouses with employers who are ready and eager to hire them, the official who oversees the program said today.

   The Defense Department launched the program in June with about 60 employers on board, and it has grown to encompass 96 corporate partners who have committed to aiding spouses in finding and identifying portable jobs. The partnership also features an online job search site, http://www.msepjobs.com, and career and education counseling.

   The partnership is about finding a good fit for spouses and employers, Robert L. Gordon III, deputy assistant secretary of defense for military community and family policy, said during the annual partners meeting at the Association of the U.S. Army 2011 Annual Meeting and Exposition here.

   The nation has 1.2 million military spouses -- 85 percent of whom want or need to work, he noted. Yet, one in four military spouses is unemployed or looking for work, and when they find it they earn, on average, 25 percent less than their civilian counterparts.

   Spouses aren't seeking preferential treatment, Gordon added, they just want a level playing field and the same job consideration as their civilian counterparts.

   Meanwhile, companies are seeking skilled, loyal workers with the ability to team-build and organize while working in diverse settings, and "our spouses get that through their experiences," he said.

   Military spouses represent "an unbelievable pool of talent," agreed Deanie Dempsey, wife of Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who also spoke at the event.

   As a 35-year military spouse, Dempsey said she's seen firsthand the struggles military spouses have encountered maintaining employment and education due to frequent moves. Employers are hesitant, she added, to hire someone who may be moving in a year or two. But they would be missing out to bypass a military spouse, she said.

   Spouses are "dedicated, they're patriotic and resilient," she said. "If the last 10 years has proven nothing else, it's proven that for our spouses."

   Over the past 10 years, spouses have juggled households, kids, careers and education -- and done so singlehandedly during deployments and separations, Dempsey said.

   These spouses have a "wealth of experiences," she added.

   Dempsey cited Army spouse Tiffany Smiley whose husband, Army Capt. Scott Smiley, was blinded in a car bomb attack in Iraq in 2005. When it didn't look like her husband would be able to continue service, Tiffany stood by her husband and supported his choice to stay in the Army. He became the Army's first active-duty blind soldier and the couple went on to have two children, she said.

   "Wouldn't you want to have someone like that on your side?" Dempsey said.

   As for the partnership, "I truly believe it's a win-win situation for employers and for the spouses," she said.

   Gordon recalled a day early in his tenure when an employer came into his office and said he loved military spouses because they were "highly skilled and cheap."

   "That's not how it's going to be," he said.

   But the DOD can't do it alone it will take a community to level that playing field, he said, noting that 70 percent of the military community lives in the civilian community.

   "When we think about solutions to empower our military community to be the very best they can be, it's not just about DOD, it's about working on this together.

   "Our spouses deserve it, and so do our employers," he added.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Army Leadership Discusses Budget Outlook

by C. Todd Lopez, Army News Service

 

   WASHINGTON - Additional budget cuts beyond the $450 billion the Defense Department already has planned for the next 10 years would be "catastrophic," Army Secretary John M. McHugh said yesterday.

 

   Army Secretary John M. McHugh speaks during opening ceremonies for the Association of the U.S. Army's annual meeting and exposition in Washington, D.C., Oct. 10, 2011. U.S. Army photo by C. Todd Lopez

 

    Speaking at the opening day of the 2011 Association of the U.S. Army's annual meeting and exposition here, McHugh said the potential for the department to face additional budget cuts of $500 billion to $600 billion in the next decade keeps him up at night.

   Those additional cuts could happen if a congressional "super committee" looking at ways to reduce the federal debt by $1.2 trillion can't come to agreement by Thanksgiving. If that happens, the debt reduction law passed over the summer forces a "sequestration," by which as much as half that amount must come from national security spending.

   "I think we're in a positive position to accommodate at least the $450 billion or so in cuts that have been scheduled against the DOD to this point," McHugh told a panel of journalists at the meeting. But sequestration would be catastrophic, he added, "certainly to the Army and certainly to our national defense posture."

   Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno said at the meeting that the potential for a "hollow force" would not come to fruition. Instead, he said, a ready and capable force would exist, though its size might be affected.

   "No matter what happens, we are not going to have a hollow force," Odierno said. "We are going to have a force that is a certain size that has the modernization and readiness necessary to be quality."

   McHugh and Odierno agreed that defense cuts likely would be shared equally across the services.

   Earlier, at the opening ceremony of the AUSA event, McHugh addressed more than 3,000 guests, including soldiers, civilian employees and defense contractors. He pointed out that while all services contribute to the fight, the Army carries the brunt of the mission in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

   "There's no getting around the fact that it is the Army that has been saddled with much of the burden these past years, providing between 50 to 70 percent of our deployable forces," he said. "While I am loath to view our men and women in uniform as mere budgetary statistics, I think it is important to remind people that while the U.S. Army represents half of our nation's entire force, we consume only a quarter to 30 percent of the entire defense budget."

   The secretary said decision makers often fail to correctly predict the nature of future conflicts and that following conflicts like World War I, World War II and Korea, for instance, basing budget decisions on the notion that ground forces were no longer relevant. Those decisions ended up depleting Army forces and reducing quality of life for soldiers and their families, McHugh said.

   This time, he added, the Army has seen the economic downturn in advance, as well as the impending budget cuts.

   "Unlike in the past, this time we have seen this downturn coming for some time," he said. "We have been analyzing the best ways to meet these challenges, and as such, I can tell you we are better positioned than at any time in our nation's history to deal with the fiscal realities and do it in a way that truly makes sense."

   Part of dealing with fiscal realities, McHugh said, is cuts to the total number of men and women in uniform. The end strength will eventually look different than it does now, and with the drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army can handle the challenge of end-strength reductions, he said.

   "But what is critically important is that no matter what the force ultimately looks like, we have sufficient time to ramp down to ensure we do it in a balanced way, and that we have what is necessary for training and equipment and reset," McHugh said.

   Another concern, he said, are suggestions that some of the services recover at the sacrifices of others and that the United States probably doesn't need a strong and decisive standing Army. In that point of view, the future resembles the motion picture "Transformers" more than it does the film "Saving Private Ryan," McHugh told the audience. "History looms before us once again," he added.

   McHugh said that while air power and technology are critical, America's enemies often don't fight the way Americans predicts they will. Boots on the ground, he said, are critical for the nation's defense.

   "No major conflict has ever been won without boots on the ground," he said. "And accordingly, our national interests demand that while we set about the task of reshaping this Army for the years ahead, we remain steadfast and continue to support this, the greatest land force the world has ever known."

   Efforts to help the Army find ways to save money and absorb looming budget cuts already are under way, McHugh said.

   For example, he said, the service is removing redundancies and overlap in research. Additionally, McHugh said, he has asked that the Army look into the multiple and expensive temporary task forces that have become "permanent."

   Also under way, he added, are efforts to streamline the requirements process, to reform the Installation Management Command, and to make "sweeping changes" to human capital management.

   McHugh said changes will be made to find cost savings within the Army Service Acquisition program, where $243 billion was spent in 2010 -- including $140 billion on contracts, more than half of that on services.

   A McHugh-issued directive will create a new government structure that will consolidate about 45 percent of service obligations into six portfolio management centers, he said. Those include facility support services, medical services, transportation services, electronics and communications, equipment related services, and knowledge-based services.

   "This will, I believe, improve oversight effectiveness, while helping us tailor and apply and monitor the results of better buying practices for improved acquisition, as well as leveraging portfolio demand for better prices," he said. Those types of actions, he said, will help the Army deal with the budgets that will be made for the service by others.

   McHugh said he will help to guide the Army through the budget crisis, and will keep soldiers in mind when doing so.

   "We can, we must -- and I promise you -- we will do better," he said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Face of Defense: Brother, Sister Serve in Afghanistan

by Marine Corps Cpl. Justin M. Boling, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing

 

   CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan - Marine Corps Sgt. Eric Rader and his sister, Air Force Staff Sgt. Rebecca McHenry, never imagined they ever would serve together. But their deployment together in southern Afghanistan has made them close in ways that will last far longer than their time here.

 

Marine Corps Sgt. Eric Rader and his sister, Air Force Staff Sgt. Rebecca McHenry, serve together at Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan. Rader and McHenry were raised in a military family, and have learned to rely on each other through tough times, including their current deployment. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Justin M. Boling

 

   The siblings' father, Allen Rader, was an airman who took his family from their home in Charleston, W.Va., to Alaska, Arizona, Florida, and even overseas. Eric and Rebecca have carved out similar lives for their own families.

   "We always had each other," said Rader, who deployed here in February. "Looking back at it now, I really appreciate having her and my brother, and appreciate serving with her now." The siblings said they've had a lot to catch up on since McHenry arrived in September, including Rebecca's wedding.

   "We both have our own families now," Rader said. "We will definitely spend more time together when we get back home."

   McHenry serves with the Air Force's 651st Expeditionary Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, which flies injured troops out of Afghanistan when the medical care they need is greater than military hospitals here can provide. "I love being able to help those who need it most and keep brave troops alive," she said.

   "There is a great sense of pride in knowing that my sister helps my fellow Marines and other troops get back on their feet and home to their loved ones," Rader said.

   Rader is deployed with 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing from Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, N.C. He serves with the headquarters of the air combat element for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force's Regional Command Southwest, and helps units rotating in and out of Afghanistan.

   "I am very proud of my brother for being a Marine," McHenry said. "I like knowing that he does a great job, and I see the fruits of his labor, seeing all the Marines walking around in Afghanistan [and] knowing he played a small part in that."

   Despite the rigors of deployment, Rader and McHenry said they find time to speak about their lives and families back home almost every day.

   "My sister is always sitting at the dining facility waiting for me at lunch," Rader said. "It makes the time go by faster, having something to look forward to almost every day."

   "He used to pick on me sometimes," McHenry said of her brother. "Since being out here, he has only been protective -- the perfect gentleman."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Marine Pursues Photography in Afghanistan

A Potential Career for a Nyssa, Ore., Native

by Marine Corps Cpl. Rashaun X. James, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing


   CAMP LEATHERNECK, Afghanistan - Marine Corps Sgt. Tristeza Castellanoz hasn't let her deployment here get in the way of her passion for shooting… pictures, that is.

What began as a casual interest in photography for Marine Corps Sgt. Tristeza Castellanoz has grown into a long-term hobby, a method of expression and a potential career for the Nyssa, Ore., native. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Rashaun X. James"

 

   Capturing moments in time is a passion for Castellanoz. What began as a casual interest in photography has grown into a long-term hobby, a method of expression and a potential career for the Nyssa, Ore., native.

   Castellanoz's interest in photography began when she was around 13, she said, when she always had an abundance of film rolls to be developed, full of whatever images she captured in the world around her.

   Now Castellanoz is an aviation operations specialist deployed here with 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing. As the wing's air tasking order chief, she oversees air support requests from Marines and their coalition partners operating in southwestern Afghanistan.

   Castellanoz has a busy job during her year-long deployment here, but when a lull in her schedule presents itself, she often grabs her professional-grade digital camera and continues to hone her skills, finding her weaknesses and strengths. The thing she enjoys most is photographing people.

   "I like seeing how a person grows over time," she said. "It's interesting for me to see how my siblings, who all have children now, have grown up and how much their children favor them."

   The people around Castellanoz often become the subjects of her photos. "I took pictures of the Marines in my exercise class and let them have them afterwards," she said. "My officer in charge was telling me that he sent them to his wife as well as other Marines that work for me."

   Having had no formal training, Castellanoz progresses her skills by experience alone, taking any opportunity to capture a unique moment.

   "Since I got my new camera, I've gotten a lot of offers from people to come and take photos for them," she said. "I do photography jobs on the side now, mostly for friends and family. When I went home on emergency leave, I did a photo session for my best friend to give to her father on Father's Day."

   Castellanoz said she has received several offers to photograph weddings and other events, but has had to turn them down due to her deployment. However, being deployed to a foreign land yields its own set of unique opportunities.

   "Being in the Marine Corps has definitely helped my photography skills," she said. "It's given me a way to do things that I normally would not have the opportunity to do back in the states.

   "I think that if I wouldn't have enlisted and just stayed in Oregon, I would've been limited on where I could travel to and what I could take pictures of," said Castellanoz, who is deployed out of Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, S.C. "While I've been stationed on the East Coast, I had the opportunity to go to New York around New Year's and got to take pictures of Central Park."

   After her career in the Corps, Castellanoz said, she plans to pursue a career in photography. But while she remains on active service, she said, she may consider changing specialties to a field with a focus on photography.

   "I like my job, I like what I do, and I like being in charge," she said. "But, if the Marine Corps gives you the opportunity to pursue something you can do after the Marine Corps, you should take it."

   While Castellanoz has other passions including playing guitar, singing and cooking, photography is something that has shown her a way to express herself and relate to the emotions of others in a special way.

   "Photography really inspires me, and I feel like my passion for it became greater and more realized after my dad passed away," she said. "So much lies in a photo. It can show you emotions at times that words can't. Now more than ever, I want to pursue this, because I never want to miss a moment that could last a lifetime for me or the people I am photographing."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Cyber Strategy's Thrust is Defensive

by Karen Parrish, American Forces Press Service


   WASHINGTON - In March, a cyber attack on a defense company's network captured 24,000 files containing Defense Department information.

   Nations typically launch such attacks, Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III said today, but a growing risk of terrorist groups and rogue states developing similar capabilities drives the need to strengthen the nation's cyber defenses.

   "All of the advanced capabilities we have, whether it's targeting or navigation or communication, ... have a backbone that's run through information technology," he said. "So if you're a smart adversary and you're seeking an asymmetric way to come at the United States, cyber will appear to you very, very quickly."

   Lynn spoke to Pentagon reporters about how the Defense Department's new Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace counters such threats. Officials released an unclassified version of the strategy today.

   Attacks in cyberspace are hard to trace to the source, which makes retaliation an ineffective strategy, Lynn said, noting that DOD's approach is to harden defenses and reduce incentives for attacks.

   The strategy rests on five pillars, he said: treat cyber as a domain; employ more active defenses; support the Department of Homeland Security in protecting critical infrastructure networks; practice collective defense with allies and international partners; and reduce the advantages attackers have on the Internet.

   The department established U.S. Cyber Command in May 2010 to address the Internet as a domain, just as it does land, sea, air and space. Cyber Command develops doctrine, training and equipment for cyber defense, Lynn said.

   "We have, within Cyber Command, a full spectrum of capabilities, but the thrust of the strategy is defensive," Lynn said. "We think we need to be able to defend our networks just to maintain our offensive advantages in all of the other areas."

   Lynn said the active defense facet of the strategy seeks to avoid a "Maginot Line" approach, focused only on the perimeter.

   "You want to be able to hunt on your own networks, to find things that get past the perimeter," he said. "It's a more dynamic approach to defense."

   Lynn said DOD is responsible for defending military networks, but the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for government networks and working with the private sector on defending critical infrastructure. But the Pentagon has an important role to play supporting Homeland Security's efforts, Lynn said, because it relies on the power grid and the transportation and financial networks.

   "If we were in some sort of world where we were able to protect the military networks and the power grid went down, that would not be good militarily," he said.

   "We think that over time, research and development money might rebalance that somewhat and impose costs on the attacker," Lynn said, offering as an example of promising technology the ability to encrypt data at rest without increasing processing time, which the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and private-sector companies are working to develop.

   "That's the kind of thing that would ... give more advantages to the defender. So if you broke in [to a network] you would then have to decrypt the data," he said. "It's a much, much harder problem for an attacker."

   In the 1980s and 1990s, DOD invested in high-performance computing for cryptanalysis and other military applications, Lynn noted.

   "That helped seed a whole industry," he said. "It helped, I think, accelerate the development of technologies."

   Similar advances can result from the department's efforts now, he said, noting DOD's cyber investment includes a half billion dollars in research funding for DARPA in the last budget.

   "We've got a very strong partnership with our defense industrial base now," he said. "We have, I think, worked through processes where we're sharing data, sharing an understanding of the threat ... and that just strengthens everybody."

   Close cooperation among DOD, other agencies and private industry limits risk, Lynn said, because defenses can be put in place quickly to limit the spread of harmful attacks.

   DOD also coordinates with defense companies and the information technology industry through the enduring security framework, he said, which allows the department to solicit technical solutions to threats.

   "It's a very soft touch," he said. "This is a collaborative forum. ... There's no government direction in that, but we've seen several specific instances where they have indeed made upgrades based on the description of the threats."

   On the international front, the United States has reached agreements with NATO, as well as with individual nations, including the United Kingdom and Australia, Lynn said.

   "The White House just put out an international strategy with the idea of broadening that group of international partners," he added.

   "There certainly are sovereignty issues," Lynn said. "I think that's where collective defense is a critical element. If you exchange information about the kinds of threats, the kinds of signatures you're seeing, ... you're able to get early warning."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Sensor Network Detects Nuclear Blasts Worldwide

by Cheryl Pellerin, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - At any time of the day or night, on any day of the year, if a nuclear device explodes anywhere on Earth, a Defense Department network established in 1947 will know about it.

 

The Air Force's WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft collects air samples from areas around the world where nuclear explosions have occurred. U.S. Air Force photo”

 

   That was the year Army Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower directed the Army Air Corps to develop such a capability, and the U.S. Atomic Energy Detection System has evolved over 64 years into a one-of-a-kind global web of sensors that see, feel, hear and sniff out nuclear explosions that occur under land or sea, in the atmosphere or in space.

   The Air Force detection system and the job of monitoring three nuclear treaties -- the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty, the 1974 Threshold Test Ban Treaty and the 1976 Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty -- in 1980 became a responsibility of the U.S. Air Force Technical Applications Center, called AFTAC, at Patrick Air Force Base, Fla.

   When the system detects a nuclear event, AFTAC scientists analyze it and report findings to national command authorities through U.S. Air Force headquarters.

   David O'Brien is AFTAC's chief scientist.

   "Our responsibility is to ensure that foreign nations are adhering to the provisions of those treaties," O'Brien told American Forces Press Service.

   To monitor the atmosphere and space, he said, the U.S. Atomic Energy Detection System, called USAEDS, has sensors aboard more than 20 satellites that make up the Global Positioning System and the infrared-sensing satellites that make up the Defense Support Program.

   "The latter," O'Brien said, "are what the United States uses to detect launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles."

   Multiple sensors on all those satellites "look for phenomenology from a nuclear explosion that occurs in space or in the atmosphere," he added, "whether it's nuclear radiation or the flash from the fireball."

   The network's five hydroacoustic stations detect undersea nuclear explosions.

   "Those are just underwater microphones, and they listen for the explosion that goes off underwater," the scientist said. "By detecting the explosions on more than one underwater microphone, we can triangulate where it occurred."

   But the workhorse since the treaties came into effect to ban atmospheric nuclear testing, O'Brien said, has been the underground nuclear monitoring capability.

   "Those sensors are seismic, and the reason they're seismic is that when a large explosion occurs underground, it creates a signature that looks just like an earthquake," he said.

   Infrasound sensors measure changes in the atmosphere generated by very-low-frequency acoustic waves that can come from above-ground nuclear explosions.

   USAEDS still supplements some of its 40 seismic stations with infrasound, the scientist said, and in the 1960s used infrasound as the main way to detect nuclear explosions in the atmosphere.

   "But once we were able to get sensors on satellites," he said, "that gave us a much better capability."

   When the program first began, its only sensor, an air sampler, flew on a B-29 aircraft over the Pacific Ocean. In 1949, flying between Alaska and Japan, the sampler detected debris from the first Russian atomic test.

   Today the system uses another aircraft, a WC-135 in a program called Constant Phoenix to collect air samples from areas where nuclear explosions have occurred.

   If there is a nuclear explosion, O'Brien said, "we will [use meteorology] to project where radioactive debris would go. Then when it gets into international airspace, the aircraft can go to that spot."

   The plane collects particles so analysts on the ground can test them to see if they contain radionuclides, or radioactive elements.

   The plane also collects radioactive gases, especially radioactive xenon, which is a good indicator that a nuclear explosion has occurred.

   With all these sensors, the U.S. Atomic Energy Nuclear Detection System is the only network that operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it isn't the only global detection system.

   In 1996, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the provisions of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. One major provision prohibited nuclear explosions anywhere, by anyone.

   Another provision described a 337-facility International Monitoring System that would scan the earth for nuclear treaty violations. The IMS facilities include seismic, hydroacoustic, infrasound and radionuclide stations, but no satellite sensors.

   Most of the world's countries have signed and ratified the treaty. Three countries that have not signed the treaty have since tested nuclear devices -- India and Pakistan in 1998 and North Korea in 2006.

   The treaty has not yet entered into force -- several more countries must ratify the treaty before that happens. Until it does enter into force, some of the IMS monitoring stations operate 24 hours a day, but many do not.

   The United States has signed, but not yet ratified, the treaty, and it has helped develop the International Monitoring System, O'Brien said.

   The IMS architects "were starting from scratch in the mid-1990s, and we had many years of experience in these kinds of systems," he said.

   "So they came to us asking for any advice that would help them avoid the pitfalls of putting a new system in," the scientist added.

   The experts at USAEDS advised the monitoring system builders on worldwide logistics involved in establishing such a system and onsite installations.

   USAEDS contributes the data from many of its seismic and hydroacoustic stations to the International Monitoring System.

   "Outside of the USAEDS," O'Brien said, "the United States through the Office of the Secretary of Defense contributes seismic, infrasound and radionuclide stations to the IMS."

   As a signatory to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the United States is entitled to and receives all the data that the International Monitoring System produces.

   "We participate in all their international meetings, and we have since [the system's] inception. They occasionally come here and visit," O'Brien said. "I think both the IMS and ourselves are right at the state of the art of any technology that is practical for use in detecting nuclear explosions."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Rodriguez Outlines  International Security Assistance Force 's Drawdown, Transition Plan

by Karen Parrish, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - The drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan will begin this month with some 1,600 troops set to redeploy without replacement by fall, according to a senior U.S. commander there.

   Army Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, commander of the International Security Assistance Force Joint Command in Afghanistan, briefed Pentagon reporters here today via video link from Kabul about the drawdown and security transition, also set to start this month.

   Rodriguez, who has spent 40 months in Afghanistan since 2007, also will return to the United States this month and will assume command of U.S. Forces Command, headquartered at Fort McPherson, Ga.

   The Army National Guard's 1st Squadron, 134th Cavalry Regiment in Kabul and its 1st Squadron, 113rd Cavalry Regiment in neighboring Parwan province, both part of the Iowa National Guard, are set to redeploy with a total of 800 soldiers this month. The Marine Corps' 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment in Regional Command Southwest is set to redepoy with 800 Marines in the fall, a Pentagon official said.

   Joint Command has achieved progress, Rodriguez said, with a plan that began in summer 2009 to focus on population centers and commerce nodes aimed at strengthening the "trinity" of good governance, capable security forces and the people's confidence in government.

   "When all three work together, we know Afghans can arrive at viable local solutions," he said. "Where we have focused our efforts, we have degraded the insurgency, built the Afghan security forces, and ultimately mobilized many of the Afghan people against those who threaten their way of life."

   Afghan forces take on greater responsibility every day for preventing attacks across the country, he said.

   During a recent incident in Kabul, Rodriguez said, Afghan national security forces "prevented numerous suicide bombers from killing hundreds of civilians" in the Intercontinental Hotel.

   Coalition forces and their Afghan and international civilian partners work together to ensure governmental and developmental efforts quickly follow security gains, he said.

   "We are no longer clearing areas again and again and again," he noted. "We spend the bulk of our military effort on degrading or destroying insurgent infrastructure, but we also ensure that the planning for local security and good governance begins early enough to be implemented as soon as the security conditions allow."

   Coalition and Afghan forces have taken the fight to the insurgents since winter, Rodriguez said, targeting leaders, command-and-control networks, support bases and infiltration routes.

   "Together, we have captured or killed [more than] 1,000 insurgents over the last six months, approximately 250 percent more than in the same period last year," he said.

   This spring, joint forces located three times more weapon caches as during spring 2010, he noted.

   Coalition forces have "begun the process of working ourselves out of a job," Rodriguez said. "We will hand over the lead to the Afghans gradually, over time, and it's going to begin now."

   Handover will begin this month, the general said, in the first seven areas Afghan President Hamid Karzai designated as those where his nation's forces will assume security responsibility: Herat city, Bamiyan province, Kabul province [except Surobi], Lashkar Gah in Helmand province, Mazar-e-Sharif in Balkh province, and Mehtar Lam in Laghman province.

   "As we move forward with the plan, the transition will continue to be conditions-based," Rodriguez said. "In the tougher areas, we will thin out forces and either shift [them] to other areas or send some forces home."

   The commander said he believes transition is on track, and that coalition and Afghan forces can achieve the 2014 goal of complete Afghan security responsibility along with the planned U.S. troop drawdown.

   "We've made hard-won progress in Helmand and Kandahar, and there have been advances in a number of other areas in the east, west and north, aided by the growth of Afghan and coalition forces over the past two years," Rodriguez said.

   As the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan drops by 33,000 by the end of next summer, 70,000 more Afghan forces will enter the ranks, he noted.

   "There will be over 350,000 Afghan national security forces in place to protect the people and continue the momentum," he said.

   As the "look and feel" of the international presence in Afghanistan changes, Rodriguez said, the Afghan government will need to balance the responsibilities of providing security, rule of law, essential services, and the infrastructure capacity for sustainable economic growth.

   ISAF's plan still emphasizes building Afghan forces' capability, increasing government effectiveness in districts and provinces, and decreasing insurgent access to Afghanistan along the "porous" Pakistan border, he said.

   The focus of coalition efforts in Afghanistan is likely to shift east along that border, the general said.

   "We will end up thinning out [in the south] and then focusing more and more of our energy in the east," he said. "As far as the timing of that, again, it will be conditions-based, and it's a little bit too early to take that guess right now."

   ISAF's Afghanistan strategy needs more help from the Pakistani military, Rodriguez said.

   "We continue to coordinate and build the relationships so we can better synchronize our plans across that border, but we still need some more support in doing that," he said.

   If Pakistan's support doesn't improve, Rodriguez said, the alternative on the Afghan side of the border is to build strength in security forces and the government to "be able to handle the challenges they'll see in the future."

   Provincial and district governments must ensure they're acceptable to the people they serve, so they don't threaten security, the general said.

   "When the people become mobilized and they build a representative shura that both represents their people and holds their government accountable, then we're on the right track," he said. "That government of course has to first provide security, as well as justice and a representative opportunity."

   The most critical task facing the coalition, Rodriguez said, is to "support good Afghan leaders and encourage them to build depth within their ranks, and inspire other leaders to join in helping create a hopeful future."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Gates Ends Historic Term as Defense Secretary

by Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON, June 30, 2011 - Robert M. Gates is the only man to thank two presidents for the privilege of serving as secretary of defense.

   At the Armed Forces Farewell Tribute on the Pentagon's parade field today, Gates thanked President George W. Bush for nominating him for the job in 2006, and President Barack Obama for retaining him in it during the change in administrations in 2009.

   At the ceremony, Obama praised Gates' bipartisanship, and awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom -- the highest award a president can confer to a civilian.

   Gates also spoke to those who would have the United States withdraw from world affairs and retreat to isolationism. He took the thought from former Defense Secretary and Army Chief of Staff during World War II General of the Army George C. Marshall. Gates said that once while addressing university graduates, Marshall extolled what he considered the great "musts" of that generation.

   Marshall said the musts included the development of a sense of responsibility for world order and security, and the development of a sense of the overwhelming importance of America's acts and failures to act.

   "Now, as when Marshall first uttered those words, a sense of America's exceptional global responsibilities and the importance of what we do or do not do remain the great 'musts' of this dangerous new century," Gates said. "It is the sacred duty entrusted to all of us privileged to serve in positions of leadership and responsibility; a duty we should never forget or take lightly; a duty I have every confidence you will all continue to fulfill," he added.

   Gates said his service as secretary of defense "has been the greatest honor and privilege of my life, and for that I will always be grateful."

   The transition from the Bush to the Obama administration was the first during war in nearly 40 years, Gates said, and it showed how serious people in both parties came together to do good for the country.

   "The collegiality, thoroughness and professionalism of the Bush-Obama transition were of great benefit to the country and were a tribute to the character and judgment of both presidents," he said.

   When Gates arrived in the Pentagon in December 2006, Marine Gen. Peter Pace helped shepherd him through the intricacies of the building, and Gates thanked Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, for his help.

   Gates also thanked his "battle buddy," the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen.

   "Without Mike's advice to me, his effective leadership of the uniformed military and our close partnership, the record of the last several years would, I think, have been very different," the secretary said. "Mike was never shy about disagreeing with me, but unfailingly steadfast and loyal to me and to the presidents he served once a decision was made. He is the epitome of a military leader and officer, a man of supreme integrity, a great partner and a good friend."

   Gates said he benefited from the great team in the department when he arrived, and the great team that came in under the Obama administration. He thanked the political appointees of both parties and the career civil servants for their efforts in the Pentagon to provide for those serving on battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan.

   Gates also stressed the need for cooperation among federal agencies. He specifically pointed out the productive and warm relationship between the State Department, DOD and the intelligence community.

   "The blows struck against al-Qaida, culminating in the [Osama] bin Laden raid, exemplify the remarkable transformation of how we must fuse intelligence and military operations in the 21st century," he said.

   Gates said his views on cooperation with The State Department have evolved over his four decades of government service. When he began his public service career in 1966, he said, the secretaries of state and defense barely spoke.

   "In the case of Secretaries [Condoleezza] Rice and [Hillary Rodham] Clinton, I have not only been on speaking terms with these two formidable women, we've also become cherished colleagues and good friends," he said.

   Gates also testified before Congress on the need for more money for the State Department. "We should never forget that diplomats and development experts from State and [the Agency for International Development] are taking risks and making sacrifices in some of the planet's least hospitable places," he said. "And I speak for all our military in appreciating the contributions they are making every day to the success of our missions in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere around the globe."

   The secretary thanked his wife, Becky, for her help and support. When President Bush asked Gates to be the secretary, he asked his wife what she thought.

   "I was really wrestling with the decision and finally told her she could make it a lot easier if she just said she didn't want to go back to D.C.," Gates said. "She thought a moment and replied, 'We have to do what you have to do.' That is something military spouses have said in one form or another a million times since 9/11 upon learning that their loved one received a deployment notice or is considering another tour of service.

   "She made it easy for me to say yes to this job, to do what I had to do to answer the call to serve when so much was at stake for America and her sons and daughters in two wars," he added.

   Gates has spent much of the last few months visiting with American service members around the world. He has put a farewell message out to the troops.

   "Though I was only able to meet a small sample of those who deployed downrange, it was important to meet, to look them in the eye one last time and let them know how much I care about them and appreciate what they and their families do for our country," he said. "I'll just say here that I will think of these young warriors -- the ones who fought, the ones who keep on fighting, the ones who never made it back -- till the end of my days."

   Gates praised his successor as secretary, Leon E. Panetta, who will be sworn in as the 23rd defense secretary tomorrow.

   "This department and this country are fortunate that a statesman of Leon Panetta's caliber and experience has agreed to serve once again, and at such an important time," Gates said. "My parting advice for Leon is to get his office just the way he likes it -- he may be here longer than he thinks."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Obama Announces Troop Reductions, Way Forward in Afghanistan

American Forces Press Service


   WASHINGTON - Thanks to the tremendous progress U.S., coalition and Afghan troops have made, the United States will draw down the number of troops in Afghanistan by 10,000 this year and 33,000 by the end of summer 2012, President Barack Obama said.

"The tide of war is receding," the president said during an address to the nation from the White House. "Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm's way."

   In a statement released by the Pentagon following the presiden'ts announcement, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said the president's decision capitalizes on the security successes.

   "Over the past 18 months our troops have made tremendous progress degrading the capability of the Taliban while enhancing the Afghan security forces," Gates said. "It is critical that we continue to aggressively prosecute that strategy. I support the President's decision because it provides our commanders with enough resources, time and, perhaps most importantly, flexibility to bring the surge to a successful conclusion."

   When completed in September 2012, the drawdown will remove the last of the plus-up of forces in Afghanistan that Obama ordered in December 2009 during a speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

   In that same speech, the president announced the new Afghan strategy, which was to focus on al-Qaida, reverse the Taliban's momentum and to train Afghan security forces. He also announced that the drawdown would begin in July 2011.

   Obama said his announcement tonight is proof that the strategy is working. "Thanks to our men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals," he said. When the first stage of the drawdown is complete in September 2012, the surge will be over.

   U.S. troops will continue to drawdown as Afghan security forces take the lead for protecting their own country. As this continues, the U.S. mission will switch from combat to support.

   "By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security," Obama said.

   The United States ended its combat role in Iraq last year and there are now about 45,000 U.S. troops in Iraq providing training and support to Iraqi security forces. The reduction of 33,000 troops by the end of summer 2012 will mean about 65,000 Americans in Afghanistan.

   "Even as there will be dark days ahead in Afghanistan, the light of a secure peace can be seen in the distance," Obama said. "These long wars will come to a responsible end."

   Obama said the past 10 years have been difficult for America. "We have learned anew the profound cost of war -- a cost that has been paid by the nearly 4,500 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq, and the over 1,500 who have done so in Afghanistan, men and women who will not live to enjoy the freedom that they defended," he said. "Thousands more have been wounded. Some have lost limbs on the field of battle, and others still battle the demons that have followed them home."

   The president pledged that America will honor the sacrifices of so many and keep the sacred trust to provide the families of the fallen, those wounded and the veterans of the conflict "the care, and benefits, and opportunity that you deserve."

   In a background briefing before the speech, senior administration officials said the president's decision had the full support of the national security team. Army Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of NATO's International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, presented the president with a range of options and the risks associated with each.

   "I think there's a broad understanding among the national security team that there's an imperative to both consolidate the gains that have been made and continue our efforts to train Afghan security forces and partner with them in going after the Taliban, while also being very serious about the process of transition and the drawdown of our forces," the official said.

   The drawdown begins from a position of strength, Obama said. Al-Qaida and its Taliban allies are under tremendous pressure. Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan and more than half of al-Qaida's leadership has been killed or captured.

   "In Afghanistan, we've inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds," the president said. "Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan security forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people."

   Everything is not rosy, the president said, and the United States remains committed to preserving the gains made and expanding on them. "We do know that peace cannot come to a land that has known so much war without a political settlement," he said. "So as we strengthen the Afghan government and security forces, America will join initiatives that reconcile the Afghan people, including the Taliban." Any reconciliation will be done with Afghans in the lead.

   "The goal that we seek is achievable, and can be expressed simply: no safe-haven from which al-Qaida or its affiliates can launch attacks against our homeland, or our allies," the president said.

   "We will not try to make Afghanistan a perfect place. We will not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely. That is the responsibility of the Afghan government, which must step up its ability to protect its people; and move from an economy shaped by war to one that can sustain a lasting peace," Obama said. "What we can do, and will do, is build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures, one that ensures that we will be able to continue targeting terrorists and supporting a sovereign Afghan government."

   The president also addressed the terrorist threat that resides in Pakistan. "No country is more endangered by the presence of violent extremists, which is why we will continue to press Pakistan to expand its participation in securing a more peaceful future for this war-torn region," he said.

   The United States will continue to work with Pakistani leaders to go after terrorists. "We will insist that it keep its commitments," he said. "For there should be no doubt that so long as I am president, the United States will never tolerate a safe-haven for those who aim to kill us: they cannot elude us, nor escape the justice they deserve."

   The president stressed that America's strength overseas is anchored by prosperity and opportunity at home. "Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war, at a time of rising debt and hard economic times," he said. "Now, we must invest in America's greatest resource, our people. We must unleash innovation that creates new jobs and industry, while living within our means."

   He said the nation needs to rebuild its infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy. "Most of all, after a decade of passionate debate, we must recapture the common purpose that we shared at the beginning of this time of war," he said. "For our nation draws strength from our differences, and when our union is strong no hill is too steep and no horizon is beyond our reach.

   "America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home," he said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

DOD Makes Progress in Civilian Hiring Reform

By Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service

 

  WASHINGTON - Until very recently, applying for a civilian job at the Defense Department was an exercise in endurance and patience. Applicants had to navigate through a byzantine federal hiring process and amass thick application packets, then often waited as long as a year for any word on their applications.

  Pasquale "Pat" M. Tamburrino Jr., deputy assistant secretary of defense for civilian personnel policy, said the practice left defense offices short of critical skills for extended periods and discouraged the best candidates from even considering federal service.

  "If you are going to be in the marketplace, competing for the best and brightest, which is what we want, we want to be the employer of choice," he said. "And if you make it hard to apply, you are going to lose in the marketplace."

  Committed to attracting the best job candidates, the Defense Department is making good on President Barack Obama's mandate last year to improve the federal hiring process.

  DOD launched its own hiring reform initiative two years ago, and it's revolutionizing the way the department processes about 250,000 hiring actions a year, Tamburrino said.

  The typical timeframe for hiring new employees already has been cut from an average of 155 days to 116. "We're pretty happy with that, but we are not stopping there," Tamburrino said. His goal is to reduce that to the administration's goal of about 80 days.

  The broad, 10-step DOD hiring reform initiative covers the full spectrum of the hiring process to make it not only faster, but also simpler, less bureaucratic and more transparent, he explained. It makes applying for a DOD job more in line with what the private sector offers, he added, and ensures hiring managers have the tools they need to advertise and fill vacancies.

  It builds a closer partnership between hiring managers and human resources personnel to expedite the hiring process and make it a better experience for everyone involved, Tamburrino said.

  For applicants, gone is the burdensome Standard Form 171, the official federal resume that could run 15 to 20 pages. Also gone is the requirement that job-seekers write essays proving they have the proper knowledge, skills and abilities, called KSAs, for the job.

  Applications have gone electronic, filed through the Office of Personnel Management's governmentwide "USAJobs" portal. And once applicants enter their profile into the system, detailing their education, work history and skills, that information propagates all of their other job applications.

  After they press "send," applicants are no longer left wondering if their application has gone into a "black hole," Tamburrino said. "People are getting feedback when they submit their application," he said. "They are getting a response: 'Your application is in the queue. It has been received by the [human resources] office. It is being processed.'"

  Any questions that need to be cleared up are addressed early on to ensure they don't slow down the process.

  DOD's hiring reform initiative doesn't stop with the application process. Hiring managers are adopting new, streamlined methods to advertise their positions and interview the best-qualified candidates.

  The days of "convoluted vacancy announcements that were almost unique to every individual job we advertised" have fallen by the wayside, Tamburrino said. Now, rather than custom-writing every vacancy announcement, hiring managers are encouraged to use standardized templates that cover basic job functions at the designated occupational series and grade level. Minor edits to those templates ensure they properly describe the particular job being filled.

  "We think that makes it go a lot faster," Tamburrino said. "We are teaching managers how to do structured interviews and how to write better job opportunity announcements."

  Much of that instruction is provided through the new online Hiring Managers Toolkit, which DOD started rolling out about eight months ago and continues to refine. The toolkit offers guides, tip sheets and checklists to help hiring managers better partner with their human resources servicing centers, Tamburrino said.

  The toolkit has become the gold standard among federal agencies, receiving raves from OPM and others wanting to adopt it as well.

  "We routinely get feedback on that toolkit, that it is one of the most forward-leaning, innovative tools in the federal government," Tamburrino said. "We are unaware of any other executive agency that has a toolkit with as many tools in it and as many information pieces in it to help hiring managers. ... We think we have a lock on the market."

  Another key to DOD's hiring reform initiative are the human resources professionals themselves.

  "You are responsible for providing the very best in customer service," Tamburrino tells his HR professionals. "If an organization comes to you seeking advice, you must give clear, plain-language advice on how to address their challenge."

  As subject-matter experts who understand the nuances of sometimes daunting federal hiring regulations and know what it takes to attract and recruit good talent, HR professionals are valuable partners in helping hiring managers navigate the hiring process, he said.

  As DOD starts realizing the benefit of its hiring reform initiative, Tamburrino said, he's seeing a lot of enthusiasm about its possibilities.

  Feedback, garnered through surveys, gives job applicants and hiring managers alike an opportunity to weigh in on the improvements. Tamburrino said it also helps to uncover shortcomings in an effort to further refine the process.

  Regardless of how much the process improves, Tamburrino said he never expects to be able to declare "mission accomplished."

  "I don't think this is ever going to be over," he said. "This is continuous process improvement, and I don't think we are ever going to be satisfied with where we are." In the meantime, Tamburrino said, he's satisfied with the direction the process is taking DOD's hiring process.

  "It's timeliness and quality, balanced," he said. "It's success for the applicant and success for the manager, balanced."

  These initiatives have eliminated barriers to attracting the broadest, most talented workforce for the department's work in caring for military members and their families, conducting research, running depots and shipyards, and even developing the next-generation weapons systems, Tamburrino said.

  "Where else are you going to do that?" he asked. "We think we are a great place to work, and we give people at every level of experience a great opportunity to do really unique stuff. So we want people to gravitate to us, and we want an ability to really pick out the crown jewels that exist out there in the workforce and say, 'Come work with us.'"

  Ultimately, Tamburrino said, he'd like to see the hiring reform initiative expand its focus to "employment reform." He describes that as an effort to improve the way the Defense Department manages the careers of the civilian employees it recruits.

  "To me, it is a whole lifecycle event," he said. "Getting you in is just one step."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Mullen Says SEAL Team Represents All of Military

By Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service


   NEW YORK - The scene at the White House was "tense" during the assault on the compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the audience at the Robin Hood Foundation gala here tonight.

   Navy Adm. Mike Mullen answered questions posed by Tom Brokaw during the annual fund raiser at the Javits Center, and gave some insights into the operation.

   "It really was the culmination of a phenomenal effort on the part of all the government agencies," the chairman said. He singled out "the best intelligence work I've ever seen that enabled those in the military who executed this mission to do so successfully."

   The chairman praised President Barack Obama's decision to go after bin Laden saying it was by no means a sure thing that the al-Qaida leader was in the one-acre compound. "I thought it was a courageous decision on the part of the president," Mullen said, noting it was only a 55 percent chance that the 9/11 attack mastermind was in the compound.

   The president did "100 percent certainty in relying on our military," the chairman said.

   The SEAL team that killed bin Laden "represents 2.2 million men and women -- active, Guard and reserve," Mullen said. They are part of the best military he has seen in his more than four decades of service that started in Vietnam.

   "I've spoken to them -- they are proud of what they did; they are proud to represent this extraordinary military," he said. "They really did make a difference."

   The silent special operations warriors also would like to fade back into the shadows, the chairman said, "and I hope that we can let them do that."

   Brokaw asked Mullen about what the feeling was like in the White House when word came back from Pakistan that the team had killed bin Laden. Mullen said he was elated, but he also was still worried.

   "It was far from over at that point," he said. "They were still inside the building. There was the need to get them out and get them out safely."

   They, of course, did make it out safely. The special operators performed the mission perfectly even when faced with an additional challenge -- one helicopter had a hard landing and had to be abandoned.

   "I think tremendous credit goes to a lot of people," Mullen said. "Not only did we execute this mission, but we didn't lose anybody, none of our people were injured, and we achieved it in a way that many people didn't think we could years ago. They are the best of the best."

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

DOD Launches Online Career Transition Training for Service Members

 

   The Department of Defense today announced the launch of an online Career Decision Toolkit that will allow service members to self assess transition needs and thoroughly explore an array of transition related subjects such as: career exploration, financial planning for transition, job search success, effective resumes and cover letters, interviewing excellence, and negotiating your ideal compensation.

   "The toolkit is customized to a service member's own transition needs and assists them in cataloguing their military skills and experience in a way that helps them effectively communicate their skills to prospective employers," said John R. Campbell, deputy assistant secretary of defense for wounded warrior care and transition policy.

   The online toolkit will deliver 24-hour global access to career transition training to service members who are not geographically able to attend Transition Assistance Program (TAP) classes traditionally offered at military installations.  The toolkit's online launch also marks the second phase of a major redesign of the Defense Department's main career transition website, and a cornerstone of the transformation of TAP into a blended delivery model that takes advantage of online resources, as well as a virtual classroom settings and platforms to enhance the traditional "brick and mortar" TAP experience that most service members receive.

   Originally released in compact disc format last August, the Career Decision Toolkit was developed by the DoD's Office of Wounded Warrior Care and Transition Policy in collaboration with Departments of Veterans Affairs and Labor to assist separating, demobilizing, retiring and wounded service members, and their families, to effectively navigate their course to civilian employment and educational opportunities.

   For more information on the online Career Decision Toolkit, visit http://www.turbotap.org  or contact Office of Wounded Warrior Care and Transition Policy at 703-428-7649 or warriorcare@osd.mil.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Teams Search for Missing Americans in China

from a Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command News Release

 

   JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii - Cooperative efforts between the United States and China for accounting of Americans missing from the Korean War broadened last month with the arrival of a specially trained archeological team in Guangdong province.

   The group from the U.S. Joint Prisoners of War/Missing in Action Accounting Command, known as JPAC, arrived in China in mid-February. Some 19 JPAC recovery team members will search for 12 missing Americans lost as the result of an alleged November 1950 U.S. aircraft crash, officials said.

   Recovery teams will search for human remains, life-support items and other material evidence that may further the identification of missing Americans.

   JPAC is a jointly manned U.S. Pacific Command organization of more than 400 military and civilian specialists that has investigated and recovered missing U.S. service members since the 1970s.

   The United States and China have cooperated during POW/MIA accounting missions in the past, officials said, with both countries recognizing the significance of these humanitarian operations.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Shift in Middle East Requires U.S. Engagement

by Karen Parrish, American Forces Press Service


   WASHINGTON - The United States must remain engaged in the broader Middle East, where recent events have altered the strategic landscape, a senior military commander told the Senate Armed Services Committee today.

   Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, commander of U.S. Central Command, testified before the committee today on conditions within Centcom's area of responsibility, which encompasses not only Afghanistan and Pakistan but 18 other nations including Bahrain, Egypt, Iran and Yemen.

   Popular uprisings in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and elsewhere, Mattis said, demonstrate "the aspirations of people seeking improved economic and social conditions."

   "While the long-term impact of this unrest is unknown, it presents as many opportunities as it does challenges," the general said. "The changes that we are seeing will manifest differently in each country. People are seeking their rights, and for the most part doing so peacefully and bravely."

   Sustained military-to-military engagement is essential to the United States building common cause with its friends in the region, Mattis said.

   "It is important that we work today with the people and the governments throughout the region," he said. "We don't want to see this change slide into a new form of authoritarianism."

   While each nation marked by recent civil unrest is different, the Centcom commander said, "We remain committed to strengthening our military bonds and advancing our mutual interests in peace and opportunity for all."

   Egypt has proven the benefit of mature military-to-military relationships, he said.

   "The Egyptian armed forces continue to demonstrate exceptional discipline and restraint under trying circumstances," Mattis said. "As [Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] recently noted, our assistance has helped the Egyptian military become the professional force that it is today, just as our military has learned a great deal from our Egyptian counterparts, who have contributed a stabilizing influence in this time of transition."

   The United States cannot achieve its broader objectives in the Middle East through military means alone, Mattis told committee members.

   "Our efforts require coordination and a spirit of collaboration between highly integrated civilian-military teams," he said. "Our civilian colleagues need your full support, even in this difficult fiscal environment, to undertake their essential role in today's complex environment."

   The general said robust resourcing for the State Department is an investment in reducing the need for military forces.

   "Together, our military leaders and our diplomats not only represent a symbol of America's enduring commitment to the region, but they also build trust through partnerships that have an important stabilizing effect when trouble looms," Mattis said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Center Provides Advice on Post-deployment Intimacy Issues

by Lisa Daniel, American Forces Press Service

 

   BETHESDA, Md. - In the list of problems that can confront service members after a combat deployment, few can be harder to talk about or more devastating than the inability to resume intimate relationships.

   Couples who have survived multiple combat deployments know the situation all too well.

   "The first few years of the war, everybody thought they'd get off the plane and the honeymoon would start," Rebekah Sanderlin, an Army wife at Fort Bragg, N.C., and "Operation Marriage" blogger, told American Forces Press Service. "The first two weeks are good, then it's downhill for several months.

   "We had a hard time just feeling like we knew each other," Sanderlin said of her husband, who has deployed several times. "It was like there was a stranger in the house. Even if we were physically intimate, we really didn't feel connected."

   The Sanderlins are far from alone. "I haven't met anybody who just bounces right back," she said of redeployed couples.

   While it's hard to quantify the problem, it is common enough that psychiatrists with the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, part of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences here, are reaching out with information to health care providers, counselors and military families to help troops re-establish deep connections - both emotional and physical - upon returning home.

   "Intimacy is an important part of post-deployment health care," Dr. Stephen J. Cozza, associate director of the center and professor of psychiatry at the university, told American Forces Press Service and the Pentagon Channel. Any couple separated for many months needs to be patient and give extra attention to their relationship after a deployment, he added.

   But for those suffering from the current wars' signature wounds of post-traumatic stress or traumatic brain injury, "those conditions can have a profound effect on relationships, and especially intimacy," Cozza said.

   People with post-traumatic stress sometimes experience personality changes, become emotionally distant or avoid people and feelings, he explained. TBIs can further complicate relationships, and especially sexuality, depending on the injury, which may leave the person in physical pain and cause their partner to double as caregiver, he said.

   Add to that possible side effects of medications, impulsive or violent behavior, or substance abuse, and many post-deployment problems can hinder intimacy, Cozza said.

   All of this can be devastating to couples and seeking help can be difficult. "How do you bring that subject up?" Cozza asked. "Often, we just don't even have the words to express it."

   The center has developed fact sheets and guidance for health care providers and families on issues of reintegration and intimacy. They cite intimacy as an often neglected area of care and urge people to talk about their problems -- and for providers to bring up the issue.

   Other guidance for health care providers includes:

-- Educate patients and partners about implications of brain injuries, especially in areas that control sexuality, inhibitions and impulses;

 

-- Encourage communication to work through redeployment changes, including self-image; and

-- Urge creativity in finding solutions to intimacy challenges.

   "It's really important for people to have a sexual relationship that doesn't have to be all about sex," Cozza said.

   Sometimes service members return home more intense and aggressive than when they left, and they may have different attitudes about sex, Cozza said. Counselors can help them work through those changes, he added, and partners should refrain from sex until it's mutually enjoyable.

   Many couples can work out their post-deployment intimacy problems within a few months of being back together, and even in the case of serious injuries, intimacy usually returns over time, Cozza said.

   The center's tips for improving intimacy include:

-- Find ways to be close that do not involve sex, such as showing affection in other ways;

-- Spend quality time together;

-- Talk about your feelings, hopes and desires when you're both calm and ready to listen;

-- Respect your partner's need for space; and

-- Schedule intimate time.

   Sanderlin and her husband discovered that a little professional counseling can go a long way.

   "I recommend counseling for everybody," she said. "TRICARE pays for it, and all you have to do is call Army OneSource." But no matter how many times her husband deploys, Sanderlin said, reintegration always is a challenge.

   "It seems to take several months to feel normal again," she said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Preparation Aids Financial Stability During Deployments

by Elaine Wilson, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - Preparation and a detailed spending plan can help servicemembers and their families dodge the financial pitfalls that can spring up during and after a deployment, the Pentagon's personal finance director said.

   "A deployment is a very demanding and intense time, and the servicemember and family need to be focused on their specific missions," Dave Julian said today in an interview with American Forces Press Service. "It's hard to do that if there's a big financial situation lurking."

   The most important step military families can take prior to a deployment is to sit down together and develop a spending plan, Julian said. The plan should include what the existing bills are, who will pay them, how they'll be paid and where the money needs to be sent. Installation personal financial managers and Military OneSource consultants can offer help with developing a plan, he added.

   To facilitate financial transactions, Julian recommended both spouses be listed on all accounts with equal access and suggested they share usernames and passwords prior to a deployment. For single servicemembers, powers of attorney can give a family member permission to handle some types of financial transactions. The legal office is the best place to go for help with these documents, he noted.

   In any case, servicemembers and their families should notify their financial institutions and creditors of an upcoming deployment. They may be able to get a break on car insurance or on interest rates, Julian said.

   Another avenue for financial relief is the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. This act has provisions that can, for instance, cap interest rates for some debts incurred prior to being activated for duty at 6 percent or prevent court actions from taking place during a deployment. Certain provisions, such as the 6 percent cap, apply only to reserve component members, Julian noted, so it's important to be aware of the guidelines.

   The pre-deployment discussion also should include how pay will change in conjunction with a deployment, Julian said, noting that in many cases servicemembers will receive a "sizeable increase" due to imminent danger pay and combat zone tax exclusion, which makes pay in theater tax-free.

   "The plan should address what should be done with the extra money," he advised.

   An increase in pay, while fortunate, can turn into a liability if families change their spending habits during a deployment without taking a post-deployment drop in pay into account, Julian noted.

   "There's a temptation to adjust spending behaviors to accommodate the increase," he said. "People may make purchases that have monthly payments that are based on the increased deployment pay. That can present a problem later on."

   To avoid overspending, Julian suggested people maintain their pre-deployment standard of living during the deployment and earmark extra money to pay down debt or stockpile money for the future in programs such as the Thrift Savings Plan or the Savings Deposit Plan. Deployed servicemembers in a tax-free combat zone are able to contribute up to $49,000 to the TSP, which includes an annual limit of $16,500 in tax-deferred contributions.

   "Most servicemembers are young, which is the best time to invest," Julian said. "There's no better investment/savings vehicle than the Thrift Savings Plan, a 401K-style plan. I strongly encourage families to invest in that. Make the money you make while deployed work for you."

   The Savings Deposit Plan enables deployed servicemembers to earn a guaranteed 10 percent annual return on up to $10,000 invested.

   "It's a great deal," Julian said. "You can't find a guaranteed 10 percent return anywhere."

   Pre-deployment servicemembers also should broach the difficult topic of what to do in the event of an injury or death, Julian advised. Families could be the recipients of sizeable lump-sum amounts -- $100,000 to $400,000 or even greater -- in the event of traumatic injury or worse to the servicemember. It's important to understand what those benefits are and what the expectations are in regards to the money, he said.

   And to ensure money ends up in the right hands, servicemembers should check with their personnel office to ensure beneficiaries are up to date, Julian stressed, particularly if there's a new spouse or family member in the household.

   Julian also emphasized the need to establish an emergency fund with a minimum of $500. "You can have the best plan in the world, but some contingencies may happen on deployment that you didn't anticipate," he said, noting that unexpected incidents, such as a car breaking down or a basement flooding, can arise during a deployment.

   This contingency money should help eliminate the need for high-interest, short term loans such as pay day loans. Instead, if needed, Julian suggested servicemembers and their families seek assistance from a service relief society, such as Air Force Aid, Army Emergency Relief, or the Navy and Marine Corps Relief Society. On-base banks and credit unions are trusted agents as well.

   "There are places to go for help that are inside the gate," he said.

   Julian said the best advice he can give deploying servicemembers is to attend any and all pre-deployment briefings.

   "They're the best one-stop shopping to get connected with the right resources and people," he said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Medal of Honor Recipients Promote Mental-Health Support

by Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - Twenty-eight Medal of Honor recipients recently launched the "Medal of Honor, Speak Out" campaign to encourage troops struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries and other health problems to take advantage of services to help them.

   The Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipients dating back to World War II echo a common theme in video messages for today's returning combat veterans: Take advantage of the resources now available to treat the unseen scars of war.

   "Make use of them," they encourage today's troops. "Stay strong, and don't let the enemy defeat you at home."

   The Medal of Honor recipients, many who have endured harrowing wartime experiences, acknowledge in individual videos the emotional challenges many returning combat veterans experience.

   "I know firsthand the challenges of war," said former Army Staff Sgt. Drew Dix, who received the Medal of Honor for his actions as a Special Forces adviser in Vietnam. "Your experiences in combat are so powerful that very few will or can understand what you went through."

   Retired Army Maj. Gen. Pat Brady, a helicopter ambulance pilot who received the Medal of Honor for his actions in Vietnam, said he and his crewmembers treated the physical wounds of the warriors they rescued, but recognized that their unseen scars of combat ran deeper.

   "There were other wounds, wounds that went beyond flesh and blood; wounds that could not be rescued by helicopters," Brady said. "Those enemy scars followed our troops home."

   George E. "Bud" Day, an Air Force forward air controller in Vietnam, encouraged today's troops to seek help that wasn't available when he returned from combat.

   "Back in those days, they didn't have the services, resources and tools that are available today to help servicemembers and their families deal with the challenges of adjusting after deployment," Day said. "The tools and resources are there now. Please make use of them."

   The Medal of Honor recipients expressed pride in today's servicemembers who are following in their footsteps.

   "Thank you for your service to our country," said Hershel "Woody" Williams, a former Marine who received a Medal of Honor for his actions during World War II. "We are so proud of you."

 

 

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Navy to Start Training Female Submariners in July

by Lisa Daniel, American Forces Press Service

 

   WASHINGTON - Navy officials today announced they are moving ahead with plans to integrate women onto submarines beginning in late 2011 or early 2012.

   The decision became public after Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates notified Congress in February of the Navy's desire to add women to submarines. With a congressional review period complete, Navy officials say they will begin taking applications with a goal of training 19 women, starting in July.

   "There are extremely capable women in the Navy who have the talent and desire to succeed in the submarine force," Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said in a press release. "Enabling them to serve in the submarine community is best for the submarine force and our Navy. We literally could not run the Navy without women today."

   Adm. Gary Roughead, chief of Naval Operations, seconded his enthusiasm for the change. "As a former commanding officer of a ship that had a mixed-gender crew, to me it would be foolish to not take the great talent, the great confidence and intellect of the young women who serve in our Navy today and bring that into the submarine force."

   Vice Adm. John J. Donnelly, commander of Naval Submarine Forces, noted that about half of all science and engineering bachelor's degrees today are awarded to women. "Maintaining the best submarine force in the world requires us to recruit from the largest possible talent pool."

   The Navy's plan for integration calls for recruiting female Naval Academy graduates and providing them the same training as given to male submariners, Rear Adm. Barry L. Bruner, commander of Submarine Group 10 and the leader of the Women on Submarines Task Force, said during a phone interview with reporters.

   "We're looking for the same qualifications that we have for men," Bruner said. "There is no difference." Those qualifications include a technically-based education that includes calculus and physics, he said. Female candidates for submarine duty also will undergo the Navy's intense interview and screening process for prospective underwater sailors.

   Because the policy is new, officials can't yet gauge women's interest in serving on submarines, Bruner said, but added that a number of female academy students and graduates have shown interest.

   The plan calls for phasing in three female officers in eight different crews of guided-missile attack and ballistic missile submarines, Bruner said. The class they will serve in is comprised of 14 ballistic missile submarines and four cruise missile submarines, he said. The submarines were chosen because the berthing and restrooms are designed so they need very few changes, he said. It is too soon to say specifically which submarines they will serve on, but there will be one each in King's Bay, Ga., and Bangor, Maine, he said.

   Bruner became convinced of the need to integrate women onto submarines years ago, he said, after spending some time aboard allied nations' submarines that included women crew members.

   "I went in really with my eyes wide open," he said. "I came away under the impression that there is no difference in the camaraderie or abilities [of crews] on ships with women on board."

   Bruner later became the commander of a strike group with women on all of its ships. "I asked, 'Why aren't we doing this on submarines? It's such a viable talent pool.'"

   The Navy has learned from its 1994 change that integrated women onto surface ships, Bruner said. The service will have enough women on ships and submarines, he said, so that they aren't isolated. And, men and women submariners will have additional training before the integration and there will be female sailors available as mentors, he said.

   After talking to current submariners and their families, Bruner said, he doesn't think the integration will cause much of a cultural change.

   "The change to the culture on submarines is going to be pretty minimal, to be honest," Bruner said. The only concern among current submariners, he said, is that all crew members live up to the demands of the undersea service.

   "When you wear the dolphins of a submariner, you have to prove that if there is a casualty on the ship that could result in the loss of the ship and all the lives on the ship, you have to be able to react correctly to save the ship," Bruner said. "That's the most import thing to submariners."

   Bruner said he has no doubt that the women will prove themselves.

   "I think we have the right processes in place and we'll train on them again," he said. "We'll hit all the potential areas that could cause problems."

   At a town hall meeting held last night at King's Bay Naval Base, Bruner said, only two wives within an audience of about 75 expressed discontent over the new policy. Their concerns, he said, were whether women would get preferential promotions.

   Bruner reiterated that the women will be held to the same workplace rules as men. "Sometimes change can be hard, and the way you get through it is through education and explaining why you're doing it and how you'll go through it," he said.

 

________________________________________________________________________________